The Precambrian Rabbit:
(Last time)
Apparently, JBS Haldane, an outspoken proponent of Darwin's theory of evolution, was once accused of religious zealotry in his dedication. He was told that he was unwilling to accept counter-evidence. The stories - there are multiple accounts - say that he replied, "fossilized rabbits in the Precambrian." The more I'm reading about the story, the more it seems to be... scientific folklore? The accounts range, but for our purposes, it doesn't matter. Essentially, as skeptics and free-thinkers, it's important for us to be willing to admit counter-evidence to avoid belief-fossilization. So the question was put: what is your Precambrian rabbit when it comes to religion? Is there something that could make you a believer?
And so the conversation was launched... We talked about problems of verification and direct, observable, divine intervention. Hallucination might explain any appearance of angels or apocalyptic beasts. We eventually stumbled upon the conundrum of whether or not a deity could even be trusted. Surely, any deity powerful enough to come across as a god could easily just be sufficiently more advanced than the human species. James brought up Ardra from Star Trek: the Next Generation. It would be very feasible for an alien to trick humanity in its present state into believing of its divinity. Arthur C. Clark's Third Law was referenced regularly throughout the conversation. Magic isn't always magic.
Cyrus pointed out that the appearance of a deity is entirely different than a system of belief. After all, when it comes right down to it, the possibility becomes far less mystical when we think of the fact that there are essentially three possibilities for the abiogenesis as it were: it was moved; it moved of its own natural force; a third unknown possibility. None of these possibilities jump to religion. As Charles pointed out, the belief in something that isn't explicable, immediately, by science doesn't mean that a person has adopted a belief structure - that's a very large jump.
This eventually brought us to a round robin conversation about our personal experiences that could make us question hard science - I won't go into what people said because some of the conversation ranged from somewhat to deeply personal. Not only was I asked specifically to keep some of these secret, I don't think that I could do some of these justice. I don't know if I remembered to mention this, but as far as helmets go, it's pretty compelling. As time went on, the conversation got lighter - referencing the God of Gaps, 42, and the Game of Roy.
Next Sunday:
On the 2nd of April, I was thinking that we could talk about something that touches intellect, evolution, philosophy, and possibility a person's raison d'ĂȘtre: let's talk about beauty. Why did our species develop it? Beyond sexual appeal - why do we find colors and patterns and various aesthetics so pleasing? Why are religious people so obsessed with using it as a reason for belief? Evolutionary aesthetics? Where do you find beauty? What do you think the reason for this is? Is there a reason?